The Vatican released a statement Friday attempting to portray
Pope Francis 1’s meeting with homophobe Kim Davis as a misunderstanding.
“The pope did not enter into the details of
the situation of Mrs. Davis, and his meeting with her should not be considered
a form of support of her position in all of its particular and complex
aspects,” the Rev. Federico Lombardi, the Vatican spokesman, said in Friday
morning, according to the New York Times.
New
York Times
Liberty Counsel, which represents Davis, says the Vatican is lying, according to the Advocate, a gay advocacy publication.
Liberty Counsel, which represents Davis, says the Vatican is lying, according to the Advocate, a gay advocacy publication.
Davis had been briefly jailed for refusing
to marry same-sex couples and her supporters claimed the meeting with the pope
showed that he supported her.
Supporters of Davis, who was jailed for a
week for refusing to obey a court order requiring her to issue marriage
licenses to gays, had claimed the papal meeting was proof the Vatican supported
her.
“I was very disappointed to see the pope
having been used that way, and that his willingness to be friendly to someone
was turned against him,” Father James Martin said. Martin, editor at
large of the Jesuit magazine America.
The Vatican stopped short of calling the
author of an article comparing Davis to a conscientious objector a liar.
“Inside the Vatican” reported that the pope had said:
“Conscientious objection is a right that is a part of every
human right. It is a right. And if a person does not allow others to be a
conscientious objector, he denies a right. Conscientious objection must enter
into every juridical structure because it is a right, a human right. Otherwise
we would end up in a situation where we select what is a right, saying ‘this
right that has merit, this one does not.’ It (conscientious objection) is a
human right.”
“Would that include government officials as well?” “It is a
human right and if a government official is a human person, he has that right.
It is a human right.”
Unlike conscientious objectors, such as draftees who refuse
to fight, Davis had run for election to her post knowing full well that it was
quite likely that same-sex marriages would soon be legal.
Not only did Davis decline to offer to do some other
community service instead of marrying gays, she even ordered her staff not to
issue licenses with her name on them.
That would be the equivalent of a conscientious objector,
assigned to carry a stretcher for the wounded in combat, telling other solders
not to fire their weapons.
It was no surprise that reports subsequently appeared on news-for-hire CNN that the pope had met a gay couple before seeing Davis.
It was no surprise that reports subsequently appeared on news-for-hire CNN that the pope had met a gay couple before seeing Davis.
No comments:
Post a Comment