In the 1830s, the French government sent political
scientists to the United States to see how the country they helped create was
doing.
The assumption was that democracy would be a tremendous
success.
What they found and reported on in “Democracy in America”
was not all positive.
Alexis-Charles-Henri Clérel de Tocqueville predicted
democracy can be just “a scenario in which decisions made by a majority place
its interests above those of an individual or minority group, constituting
active oppression comparable to that of a tryant or despot,” Wikipedia
reports.
The U.S. has a presidential candidate to wants to deport
Hispanics and Muslims.
Wikipedia adds of the term: “The term was widely employed in
mid-nineteenth-century America in conjunction with a series of moral questions
(Sabbath, temperance, racial equality) that gave rise to organized minority
groups in American political life.[9]
Lord Acton also used this term, saying:
The one pervading evil of democracy is the tyranny of the
majority, or rather of that party, not always the majority, that succeeds, by
force or fraud, in carrying elections.
— The
History of Freedom in Antiquity, 1877
The concept itself was popular with Friedrich Nietzsche and the phrase (in
translation) is used at least once in the first sequel to Human, All Too Human (1879).[10] Ayn Rand wrote
that individual rights are not subject to a public vote, and that the political
function of rights is precisely to protect minorities from oppression by
majorities and "the smallest minority on earth is the individual".[11]
In Herbert
Marcuse's 1965 essay "Repressive Tolerance", he said
"tolerance is extended to policies, conditions, and modes of behavior
which should not be tolerated because they are impeding, if not destroying, the
chances of creating an existence without fear and misery" and that
"this sort of tolerance strengthens the tyranny of the majority against
which authentic liberals protested."[12]
For those cheering exit of the United Kingdom from the
European Union, consider these questions.
Also, consider whether such a powerful decision should be
made by a small majority.
The vote was 52 percent to 48 percent, or 17,410,742 to
leave and 16,141,241 to stay.
Scotland, which rejected independence two years ago by a
bigger margin, feels betrayed
Scotland First Minister Nicola Sturgeon said she would push
for a vote to allow it to stay in the EU.
Republican presumptive nominee Donald Trump, who was in
Scotland, praised the decision.
Other world leaders have warned an exit could create havoc,
and Trump’s endorsement could hurt him in his campaign against former Secretary
of State Hillary Clinton.
She issued a cautious statement supporting the rights of all
sides in the dispute.”
Despite non-stop punditry on television and the Internet the
fact is no one knows what is going to happen.
No comments:
Post a Comment